So, I'm not worried about breaching contracts, but an important thought process that a lot of people don't give consideration, too. I have spent the last two days reading about lossless and lossy, so I have a feeling a I'm still at the beginning steps of all this.Ĭount Zero - I purposely now purchase all my music from reputable sources. only if you absolutely must have the very best audio quality, you should do your mixes with lossless files (WAV, AIFF, ALAC, FLAC, etc.).
#Best mp3 encoder 2016 pro audio 320 kbps
you are probably alright to distribute your mixes as 320 kbps MP3s. my shorter and simpler answer to your question would be the following. I note the above is both quite lengthy and quite technical. software just as foobar2000 along with the ABX component can be used to easily carry out such tests. In any case, the way to ascertain whether the 320 kbps mixes you want to share with your friends are acceptable in terms of audio quality, you should resort to double-blind listening tests.
(due to effects such as masking, the human hear cannot hear all the content that is contained in an original, lossless audio file.)
after all, MP3 encoders attempt to throw away only the information you cannot hear anyway. it's not nearly as easy to quantify the reduction in quality that occurs during lossy audio encoding. Nevertheless, i don't see how you arrive at the 72% figure. this loss is called generation loss and is potentially more severe than the loss which occurs when a lossless WAV file is encoded to MP3 for the first time (i.e., as is the case for the 320 kbps MP3s you can purchase in online music stores). Click to is correct that there will be a reduction in fidelity when you convert the mix in WAV format you got out of traktor back to 320 kbps MP3.
0 kommentar(er)
